Partners:
Everis, Spain
ETH, Switzerland
UZH, Switzerland
Freiburg, Germany
MA Systems, UK
Bristol, UK
Xiwrite, Italy
Ultrasis, UK
Jaume, Spain
Valencia, Spain
Lanzhou, China
EU-Grant (FP7):
248544
|
Coping Skills: Socio-Culturally Independent Personality Traits
To determine the number of reproducible dimensions inherent in the COPE instrument, our
structural analysis based on Neural Nets (NNs) used the Pasadena (n=407) and Lausanne (n=404)
students for iterative learning, while the Zurich data (n=406) served as independent verification
samples. We found 2 independent, highly stable and reproducible scales (factors) that
explained the observed inter-individual variation in coping behavior sufficiently well (68.6%).
These COPE scales included 17 and 11 items respectively and reflected basic coping behavior in
terms of "activity" (activity-passivity) and "defeatism" (defeatism-resilience). In a second
step, the newly contructed scales were validated by student samples from Milano (Italy: n=419),
Castellon (Spain: n=400), Cipoletti (Argentina: n=484), and Hangzhou (China: n=461).
Activity versus Defeatism
Activity is best described through items like "turning to work", "getting help and advice from
other people", or "coming up with a strategy" whereas "defeatism" is characterized by behavior like
"giving up", "using alcohol", or "refusing to believe that this has happened". "Passivity" is
understood as negative scoring on the activity scale and "resilience" as negative scoring on the
defeatism scale. The term "resilience" is used here as a broader concept, encompassing all those
endogenous mechanisms that support and maintain health, thereby enabling subjects to cope with
stressful situations. This particularly includes personality traits supporting or impeding social
skills.
External Validation
Our results suggest that the newly developed "defeatism-resilience" scale represents a highly stable,
socio-culturally independent personality trait, while the "activity-passivity" scale appears to
assess a small, socio-culturally influenced component as well. The factors "alcohol consumption",
"regular use of medicine", "illegal drugs", "impaired physical health", "psychosomatic disturbances",
"impaired mental health", and "regular exercises", as quantitatively assessed through the ZHQ, were
used to externally validate the newly constructed scales. Correlation analyses yielded
a highly significant and consistent picture of the close relationship between insufficient coping
skills on the one hand, and the state of general health on the other (Table):
References
Delfino JP, Barragán E, Botella C, Braun S, Bridler R, Camussi E, Chafrat V, Lott P, Mohr C,
Moragrega I, Papagno C, Sanchez S, Seifritz E, Soler C, Stassen HH: Quantifying Insufficient
Coping Behavior under Chronic Stress. A cross-cultural study of 1,303 students from Italy,
Spain, and Argentina. Psychopathology 2015; 48: 230-239
Mohr C, Braun S, Bridler R, Chmetz F, Delfino JP, Kluckner VJ, Lott P, Schrag Y, Seifritz E,
Stassen HH: Insufficient Coping Behavior under Chronic Stress and Vulnerability to Psychiatric
Disorders. Psychopathology 2014; 47: 235-243
Stassen HH, Delfino JP, Kluckner VJ, Lott P, Mohr C: Vulnerabilität und psychische Erkrankung. Swiss Archives
of Neurology and Psychiatry 2014; 165(5): 152-157
|
|
Mean scores and variation of scales "activity" (x-axis) versus "defeatism" (y-axis) as
derived from the COPE data of 407 students from Pasadena (green), 404 students from Lausanne (red),
and 406 students from Zurich (blue) after orthogonalization and normalization. There are
no between-center differences with respect to "defeatism" (zero on the y-axis), whereas active
Pasadena students achieved, on average, higher activity scores compared to Zurich and Lausanne.
Data from a sample of 500 students from Argentina were used for verification and underlined the
socio-cultural independence of the coping behavior scales.
|